 |
| The Astros looked comofrtable at 3-0, but blew it in 8th inning |
I don't know what incensed me more last night: the Nationals scoring seven runs in the eighth inning, or the pre-game debate over Carlos Lee's future with this ballclub.
You know, I'm not sure what
Richard Justice is high on, but whatever it is, I would like some of it. Firstly, he couches Lee's performance purely in terms of batting average (clever dick), then he suggests that a lineup containing Chris Johnson, Hunter Pence and Carlos Lee is 'formidable.'
His exact quote was:
A lineup with Chris Johnson, Hunter Pence and Carlos Lee has a chance to be pretty darn good.
You know, sometimes I wonder why I bother. And don't get me started on the comments. Ed Wade has spent the bulk of his time fixing the Astros, and most of his problem was ridding the team of several bulky contracts. Now he has nearly finished that job, what do Astros fans want him to do? Sign some more massive contracts! Carl Crawford yeah, let's sign him. He's fast, and he hits well, and has some power. Him, Pence and Bourn would be a great outfield. Jeebus.
Let us just shoot down these rumours straight away. Regardless of what the
Boston Herald seems to think, Wade is not going to do anything stupid and try and sign Crawford or Jayson Werth. The first and major problem with Werth, is that he is now a Scott Boras client. You know that guy, who everyone in Houston thinks is the Devil? Crawford will sign for silly money somewhere, and can probably expect the sort of deal Alfonso Soriano got with the Cubs. However, he is 28 already, and his legs will start to give way towards the end of a possible six-year deal. He's a great asset for a team, but he is hardly the sort of impact bat you could slot into your four spot in the lineup. He'll hit for some power, he'll swipe a lot of bases and stretch out a few triples, and he gets on-base a fair amount of time.
Now back onto Lee. If this was the plan from the beginning, then I would rather we tried to acquire a left fielder rather than a first baseman in Wallace two months ago. Then this would have all made sense. But the idea that Lee could be our everyday first baseman and Wallace spends 2011 in Triple-A is the biggest pile of bogus I've ever heard.
Ok. Basically we are liable for $39m, or something like that for Lee over the next two years. Is this made more bearable by him being on the field ****ing this team up for another two years, or do you have to say enough is enough and bench the guy, or at least platoon him in left? Now our friend in Portland Oregon was trying to argue the plus side of such a move, and maybe he believed it, or maybe he was playing devil's advocate, so I'll sum up his argument for you.
1. say that team is Padres level competitive next year, Lee might revert back to 08/09 form, and that might be the difference between playoffs and not.
2. another year is not going to adversely affect Wallace, and he can be called up at any time if the Astros are not competitive.
3. Lee showing he can play solid 1B might give the Astros a chance to trade him.
Now I understand that. I don't believe it. I don't think he did either. But perhaps there is a method in some of this madness. But its still madness.
Whatever Justice thinks, I believe we are still a good two pieces away from being ready offensively to compete. The only way our offense will be half decent in the years to come is if we allow our young players to develop, not bailing on them after 200 at bats. Give Castro, Johnson, Wallace and co. the time to develop, and they all could be above average run producers. Sticking Walace back at AAA will knock him back. He has NOTHING left to prove at AAA having spent the large majority of 2009 and 2010 at that level (201 games at AAA level in three organisations).
I like Bogusevic, Bourgeois and Jason Michaels each in their own ways, but they are all replacement outfielders. Sticking any of them in left field permanently, and giving Lee the 1B job would be plain dumb. So this would be our 2011 lineup: Bourn, Keppinger, Pence, Lee, Johnson, Manzella, Castro, Bourgeois, pitcher. Now they're gonna score a hat-full of runs! Maybe I'm being harsh on Bogey, but I don't see him as anything else than a AAAA player, despite the solid numbers he has put up at AAA. He might be a serviceable 2 hitter, but he strikes out a ton, even if he steals a good amount of bases and draws a decent amount of walks. For left field, I'm waiting for J.D. Martinez, possibly a September callup next year.
Alyson Footer spins it well, but there is no getting away from the dumb ass logic behind it.
Crawfish Boxes has its own spin on the matter. As well as we have played, I do not think we have enough offense to properly compete over 162 games in 2011, and even if we did, I don't see how Lee can be a difference maker in any of it. Read the comments on Footer's posts, especially ones from Lucas and OremLK. There is not much point in paraphrasing everything, but one commenter says 'the popular opinion is that Lee's season has been a disaster. But I think that's a misconception born out of the bad start he had on the season.' No, it has been a disaster. He'll have the odd decent game, but too often that 0-4 leaves a gaping hole in the middle of our lineup.
The sooner he is off this ballclub, whatever money we're paying him, the better. Blocking the development of other players only compounds the mistake. Lee's all-star days are long gone.
As for last night's game, it was a difficult loss to swallow considering Happ had a no-hitter going till the fifth, and held the Nationals scoreless for his six innings of work. Still, after scoring seven runs in a single inning the night before, the Nationals did exactly that to the Astros. Just one of them darned days, and you move on. If the Astros want to get to .500, they will have to win the next two games, and have Rodriguez and Figueroa pitching the next two games. Not going to be easy with Pence joining Bourn on the day-to-day casualty list. The right fielder has a sore right flexor hip muscle.